Marina, Paul has mentioned this book that might be relevant to us both. I have just found a very negative (and humorous) review of it on the times online if you follow the link below.
"...if woman is a design, then what exactly was the brief?
"The result is a rambling and quixotic pervathon that rests wholly on his patronising and flawed central thesis of woman as product. Dominated by glossy images of babes in various states of undress and yet more weirdo questions — “Is there any more potent a symbol than the breast?” and “What do curves mean?” — it is meant, clearly, to be a high-minded analysis of the form and function of the female in art, architecture, archeology and advertising from 25,000BC to the present day."
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/non-fiction/article6818840.ece
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment